<div class="at-above-post-homepage addthis_tool" data-url="https://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/essays/kavanaugh-judicial-temperament-issue-personal-view/"></div>Judicial temperament, like obscenity, is something that you know when you see, but is hard to define. Most would point to personal characteristics like probity, impartiality, a balanced disposition, equanimity, fairness, and honesty, among other characteristics. The American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary <a href="https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/scfedjud/federal_judiciary09.authcheckdam.pdf" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'download', 'https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/scfedjud/federal_judiciary09.authcheckdam.pdf');">lists the following indicia</a>: “compassion, decisiveness, open-mindedness, courtesy, patience, freedom from bias, and commitment to equal justice under the law.”
Judge Brett Kavanaugh was scoring fairly high marks for judicial temperament until his recent appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee after the testimony of Dr. Blasey Ford (which Kavanaugh denied having watched prior to his own testimony).
The Kavanaugh that we came to know from his Senate confirmation hearings, and as encored in his Fox News interview, was a calm, mild mannered, even tempered person seemingly without grudges or rancor in his heart. That he was convincing in this role is evidenced by the judgment of Jeffrey Toobin, who, as recently as September 17th, <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/17/the-deceptive-contrast-between-trump-and-kavanaugh" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/17/the-deceptive-contrast-between-trump-and-kavanaugh', 'wrote in the New Yorker');">wrote in the New Yorker</a> that Kavanaugh was “thoughtful,” displayed a “pleasant manner,“ and espoused “content free banalities.”
Then, last Thursday, like the Incredible Hulk, a completely different Kavanaugh emerged. Angry, petulant, frowning, grimacing, gulping water, and partisan in the extreme, this Kavanagh spewed rancorous attacks on his accusers, the Democratic Party, and reaching back decades, yes, even the Clintons. Portraying himself as the innocent victim of a conspiratorial political “<a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/27/brett-kavanaugh-testifies-after-christine-fords-assault-allegations/1442762002/" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/27/brett-kavanaugh-testifies-after-christine-fords-assault-allegations/1442762002/', 'hit');">hit</a>,” he decried the process that had brought him to answer Dr. Blasey Ford’s accusations. Writing for the New York Times, Greg Weiner <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/opinion/kavanaugh-supreme-court-senate-hearing.html" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/opinion/kavanaugh-supreme-court-senate-hearing.html', 'summed it up');">summed it up</a> by calling Judge Kavanaugh “one angry man.”
Who is the real Kavanagh? I am left wondering if it’s the choirboy who appeared on Fox news, Dr. Jekyll, or his fulminating counterpart, Mr. Hyde. For some, including myself, the choirboy Kavanaugh seemed too good to be true, and now the belligerent Kavanaugh seems true, yet anything but good.
My uneasy intuition tells me that the angry Kavanaugh may be the real one, and that the genteel Kavanaugh may be a well cultivated affectation to conceal what lies at his core, a sense of entitlement, privilege, and prejudice. Repeatedly citing his having graduated from Yale, and his years of hard work, Kavanaugh seemed indignant that his rightful place on the Supreme Court was subject to challenge, and worse, by the likes of these accusers.
As to prejudice, there is little doubt that Kavanaugh has no love for Democrats, progressives, or liberals. He was Kevin Starr’s hit man, a righteous gladiator determined to bring down Bill Clinton for moral improprieties. It was Kavanaugh <a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-ken-starr_us_5bad2f2de4b0b4d308d11e35" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-ken-starr_us_5bad2f2de4b0b4d308d11e35', 'who pressed Starr');">who pressed Starr</a> to ask Clinton sexually graphic questions about his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
As an illustration that, indeed, what goes around comes around, last week Kavanaugh expressed outrage over having to answer accusations of assaults on women. “Sex,” he said, “is not a topic I ever imagined would come up at a judicial confirmation hearing.” Indeed, Judge Kavanaugh, but was it not the Senate that tried Bill Clinton on the sex charges you helped engineer against him?
It is hard to escape the conclusion that Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court will have lots of scores to settle with progressives, Democrats, liberals, and the like. It is hard to imagine that he can approach the job with the open mindedness and impartiality that we, at least in theory, expect our Supreme Court judges to exhibit.
His open display of indignation last Thursday was applauded by some, in particular by President Trump, who <a href="https://www.elitedaily.com/p/donald-trumps-tweet-about-brett-kavanaughs-testimony-is-all-cheer-12080685" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'https://www.elitedaily.com/p/donald-trumps-tweet-about-brett-kavanaughs-testimony-is-all-cheer-12080685', 'issued a laudatory tweet');">issued a laudatory tweet</a>, asserting last week’s Kavanaugh showed exactly why Trump nominated him in the first place.
Such a vehement denial of guilt must point to innocence, some would say. But I have known many an accused deny their guilt with a similar vehemence, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Prisons are filled with men and women who profess their innocence with assertiveness equal to Kavanaugh’s display. Outrage and indignation can be a sign of innocence, or a defense triggered in a person caught in a lie that shatters a veneer of respectability. As <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_lady_doth_protest_too_much,_methinks" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_lady_doth_protest_too_much,_methinks', 'Queen Gertrude said');">Queen Gertrude said</a> of an actor’s performance, she “doth protest too much, methinks.”
For me it comes down to this, if credible (but, admittedly, as yet uncorroborated) accusations of sexual assault bring out such an ugly display, is Judge Kavanaugh the right man for this job? Putting aside his judicial philosophy, which is properly the subject of debate by the Senate, I think he fails the judicial temperament test. I would hope — and hope is all I can — that senators from both sides of the aisle will consider this issue dispassionately before casting their vote to elevate Judge Kavanaugh for life to our highest court.
<div class="at-below-post-homepage addthis_tool" data-url="https://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/essays/kavanaugh-judicial-temperament-issue-personal-view/"></div>

Kavanaugh and the Judicial Temperament Issue: A Personal View

Jesse Wegman graduated from New York University School of Law in 2005. He was a senior editor at The Daily Beast and Newsweek, a legal news editor at Reuters, and the managing editor of The New York Observer. In 2010, he received a Soros Justice Fellowship to write a book about jailhouse lawyers. Before that, he was a producer and reporter for several National Public Radio programs. He joined the New York Times editorial board in 2013 and is the author of the recent book Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College.

Jesse Wegman

<h4>Don Franzen is a lawyer in Beverly Hills specializing in entertainment and business law. He has lectured on entertainment law at the Eastman School of Music, Santa Monica College’s Academy of Entertainment and Technology, the Berklee School of Music in Valencia, Spain, and lectures at UCLA’s Herb Albert School of Music, where he teaches two courses on the law and the music industry. He has published articles on legal issues in newspapers, magazines, and law journals. He serves on the board of the Los Angeles Opera and counts among his clients leading performers in opera, orchestral music, film, and the recording industries. He is the legal affairs editor for&nbsp;Los Angeles Review of Books.</h4>

Don Franzen

Don Franzen and Jesse Wegman Discuss Abolishing the Electoral College

“The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law.” — Aristotle

"You can't ignore politics, no matter how much you'd like to." — Molly Ivins

Politics

"Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn anything from history." — George Bernard Shaw

History

Mortal Republic

Decline and Fall of American Democracy?

Don Franzen Talks with Erwin Chemerinsky on Trump and Emoluments

Frank-Walter Steinmeier is a German politician serving as president of Germany since March 19, 2017. He previously was minister for Foreign Affairs from 2005 to 2009 and again from 2013 to 2017, and as vice-chancellor of Germany from 2007 to 2009.

Frank-Walter Steinmeier

A Talk About Democracy

Don Franzen Talks with Adam Winkler on the Corporate Civil Rights Movement

Mary Beard Discusses Women, Power, and #MeToo

"As far as I'm concerned, being any gender is a drag." — Patti Smith

Gender &amp; Sexuality

Murder Comes to SCOTUS

"The cheaper the crook, the gaudier the patter, eh?" — Dashiell Hammett

Noir

A Guardian of Good Usage and Grammar

"Writing only leads to more writing." — Colette

Literary Criticism

Erwin Chemerinsky Explains the Lawsuit Against President Trump for Violation of the Emoluments Clause

LARB Voices: Akhil Reed Amar

A Victim of Its Own Success: Mary Beard Discusses the Collapse of the Roman Republic

<h4>A prosecutor with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office for 32 years, eight of which he was the elected District Attorney (1992-2000), Gil Garcetti oversaw 1100 prosecutors, placed a special focus on combatting domestic violence, and initiated specific programs designed to prevent crime. He also oversaw high profile prosecutions, such as the Menendez brothers, O.J. Simpson cases, and LAPD’s Ramparts Division police abuse cases. After leaving office, he taught a seminar at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government entitled “The Interaction of the Criminal Justice System, Race, Politics, and the Media”. He has also been a frequent speaker on his various photo projects, career change, the death penalty, and especially on empowering women and girls in West Africa by building bore hole wells in rural villages. He continues in his role of Consulting Producer for TNT’s two series, The Closer and Major Crimes. In 2002, he published his first photo essay book, Iron: Erecting The Walt Disney Concert Hall. His subsequent six books have all been photo essays, including Dance in Cuba, Water is Key, Paris: Women &amp; Bicycles, and Japan: A Reverence For Beauty. His books have led him to tell his stories in numerous photo exhibitions and presentations throughout the world, such as at The United Nations in New York; UNESCO in Paris; the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C.; the Fowler Museum at UCLA; and the Millennium Museum in Beijing. All of his books are discussed on his website, www.garcetti.com.</h4>

Gil Garcetti

Stephen Rohde is a writer, lecturer&nbsp;and political activist.&nbsp;For almost 50 years, he practiced civil rights, civil liberties, and intellectual property law. He is a past chair of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California and past National Chair of Bend the Arc, a Jewish Partnership for Justice. He is a founder and current chair of Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace; member of the Board of Directors of Death Penalty Focus, and a member of the Black Jewish Justice Alliance. Mr. Rohde is the author of&nbsp;American Words of Freedom&nbsp;and&nbsp;Freedom of Assembly&nbsp;(part of the American Rights series); and numerous articles and book reviews on civil liberties and constitutional history for&nbsp;Los&nbsp;Angeles&nbsp;Review&nbsp;of&nbsp;Books,&nbsp;American Prospect,&nbsp;Los&nbsp;Angeles&nbsp;Times, Ms. Magazine, Los Angeles Lawyer, Truth Out, L A Progressive, Variety,&nbsp;and&nbsp;other&nbsp;publications. &nbsp;He&nbsp;is also&nbsp;co-author of&nbsp;Foundations of Freedom&nbsp;published by the Constitutional Rights Foundation. &nbsp;Mr. Rohde received Bend the Arc’s “Pursuit of Justice” Award and his work has been recognized by the ACLU and American Bar Association. Mr. Rohde received his BA degree in Political Science from Northwestern University and his JD degree from Columbia Law School.&nbsp;

Stephen Rohde

Laurie Winer is a Los Angeles Review of Books founding editor.

Laurie Winer

Radio Hour: Will California End the Death Penalty with Proposition 62?

Don Franzen is a lawyer in Beverly Hills specializing in entertainment and business law. He has lectured on entertainment law at the Eastman School of Music, Santa Monica College’s Academy of Entertainment and Technology, the Berklee School of Music in Valencia, Spain, and lectures at UCLA’s Herb Albert School of Music, where he teaches two courses on the law and the music industry. He has published articles on legal issues in newspapers, magazines, and law journals. He serves on the board of the Los Angeles Opera and counts among his clients leading performers in opera, orchestral music, film, and the recording industries. He is the legal affairs editor for&nbsp;Los Angeles Review of Books.