Politics on the Couch: Psychoanalysis and the Presidency

In this special episode, Kate Wolf, Medaya Ocher, and Eric Newman are joined by writer and psychoanalyst Jamieson Webster to talk about the role of psychoanalysis in politics.

By LARB Radio HourNovember 19, 2024

    Keep LARB paywall-free.


    As a nonprofit publication, we depend on readers like you to keep us free. Through December 31, all donations will be matched up to $100,000.


    Subscribe on Podcasts | Spotify | SoundCloud

    Do you love listening to the LARB Radio Hour? Support the production of this weekly podcast on books, art, and culture. Donate today.


    In this special episode, Kate Wolf, Medaya Ocher, and Eric Newman are joined by writer and psychoanalyst Jamieson Webster to talk about the role of psychoanalysis in politics. Their discussion emerges from Webster's essay, “Freudulence,” published in the latest issue LARB Quarterly Journal, which reassesses a controversial book co-authored by Sigmund Freud that gives a psychoanalytic reading of the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, including his disastrous handling of the Treaty of Versailles. Taking the recent election into account, the panel debates if psychoanalysis indeed belongs in politics. Could it help the electorate as a tool for making wiser decisions or understanding why we’re attracted to certain leaders? How much does self-knowledge, or lack thereof, tip the scales of history?

    LARB Contributor

    The LARB Radio Hour is hosted by Eric Newman, Medaya Ocher, and Kate Wolf.

    Share

    LARB Staff Recommendations

    • Freudulence

      Jamieson Webster invokes Sigmund Freud and Ambassador William C. Bullitt in an attempt to psychoanalyze political leaders, in an essay from the LARB Quarterly issue no. 42, “Gossip.”